Date: May & June 2003
Location: Vinderheima
Premise: If they made iron -- then so can
we using the same techniques
Conclusion: We can't do it this way either
but this is much closer.
The Team:
Staff | Dave Kevin Gus |
Recorder | Neil Peterson |
Leader | Darrell Markewitz |
Reports of all of our iron smelting efforts along with more articles and information are available on the "Iron Smelting in the Viking Age" CD from the Wareham Forge. Copies of the CD can be purchased here. |
This year marked our second attempt to produce iron from ore. We made
some changes from the previous year. Several of our people had been
down to visit Skip & Lee. Based on some of their results we
altered the furnace design and attempted to narrow the number of
variables facing us.
This time around we eliminated the issue of randomly variable airflow
by using a vacuum cleaner motor. To allow a controlled but variable air
flow a metal plate over the intake was used.
The smelter itself was constructed differently this time using as a
template a roman smelter that came into in Scandinavia use towards the
end of the Viking Period. We began by digging a
small level area and a slightly deeper area for the run off. The first
layer of the furnace was a collection of firebrick. On top of this was
laid a pad of jewelry investment (think high temperature plaster of
paris). This pad was shaped and sloped slightly to aid the flow of
slag. When it was dry we used a rolled up sheet of metal to provide a
form. 3.7 to 5 cm of refractory concrete we laid in around the form.
Outside the concrete we laid on a layer of cobb. This was a blend of
clay, straw, and sand. 4 to 6 cm of cobb were used. A space was left in
the front to fit two firebricks as a removable door. The smelter itself
was built a couple of the weeks before the experiment and allowed to
air dry for that time (covered during any rain).
Charcoal | Overview | Adding charcoal |
Starting pile of ore | Layering wood and ore | Starting the burn | Cooling ore |
Crushing ore | Weighing ore |
Then it was time for the actual smelt.
Actual Time | Elapsed Time | Notes |
---|---|---|
1424h | The first charge was added along with a 1.5 Kg of charcoal. | |
1435h | T+0:11 | The charcoal leftovers from the ore roasting -- along with no doubt some ore was added. |
1436h | T+0:12 | The second charge with 1.5 Kg of charcoal was added |
1439h | T+0:15 | 0.75 Kg of charcoal was added. |
1448h | T+0:24 | 3 Kg of chorcoal was added. |
1452h | T+0:28 | The third charge was added after another 3 Kg of charcoal. |
1457h | T+0:33 | We altered the angle of air pipe by raising the back end 1 cm. Some more cobb was added to adjust the seal of the pipe. |
1501h | T+0:37 | 3 Kg of charcoal added. |
1506h | T+0:42 | We noticed a small amount of slag appearing by the fire bricks. |
1508h | T+0:44 | The fourth charge was added along with 3 Kg of charcoal. |
1512h | T+0:48 | The tuyure was cleared of slag by rodding it out. |
1517h | T+0:53 | The tuyure was cleared of slag by rodding it out. |
1520h | T+0:56 | Another 1.5 Kg of charcoal. |
1523h | T+0:59 | The fifth charge and another 3 Kg of charcoal was added. |
1528h | T+1:04 | The tuyure was rodded out. |
1535h | T+1:11 | 3 Kg of charcoal was added. |
1538h | T+1:14 | The tuyure was rodded out. |
1539h | T+1:15 | The tuyure was rodded out. |
1540h | T+1:16 | 1.5 Kg of charcoal was added. |
1545h | T+1:21 | The tuyure was rodded out. |
1550h | T+1:26 | The air was run up to 1/2 |
1552h | T+1:28 | Air down to zero and the doors were opened to let the slag out. We were overjoyed to see liquid pour out (ok perhaps pour is an overstatement as the first slag tapping was rather viscous). In hindsight it was our guess that this was the still liquid parts of the bowl itself flowing, rather than the liquid slag that forms above of the bowl. Some was set aside as samples the rest was (as planned) added back into the top of the smelter. The doors were closed, air returned to 1/8th, and another long burn occurred. |
1556h | T+1:32 | The tuyure was cleared again. |
1601h | T+1:37 | The wedge was removed from the tuyure to raise the air over the slag better and the air was bumped up to 5/16ths. |
1606h | T+1:42 | 1.5 Kg of charcoal was added. |
1610h | T+1:46 | Air was adjusted to 1/2 flow. |
1614h | T+1:50 | Air was adjusted to full. |
1617h | T+1:53 | 1.5 Kg of charcoal was added. |
1620h | T+1:56 | Air was adjusted to 1/2. |
1623h | T+1:59 | 1.5 Kg of charcoal was added. |
1624h | T+2:00 | The air was set to zero, the doors were opened and out came the slag (much runnier this time). This time we think we actually tapped into the slag we wanted. As of this point things were going exactly as expected. The slag was sampled and the remainder added back in to the top. |
1632h | T+2:08 | The air was turned back up to 1/2. |
1636h | T+2:12 | 3 Kg of charcoal was added. |
1637h | T+2:13 | The doors were closed. |
1641h | T+2:17 | The tuyure was rodded out. |
1644h | T+2:20 | The tuyure was rodded out. |
Now we come to the painful part. Something went wrong.
We aren't sure why but the slag pool built up enough to partially block
the airway. This deflected the air upwards allowing a cool spot to form
immediately below the airway. This caused more blockage of the airway.
In addition the deflected airflow produced a hot spot above the airway.
In this picture you can see the beginning of the burn through. We reacted to attempt to block the burn through but it was in vain. All that came of this was a heat sink that reduced the smelter temperature to a point that would not finish the smelt. |
||
1650h | T+2:26 | More charcoal was added. |
1701h | T+2:37 | Another 3 Kg of charcoal was added. |
1705h | T+2:41 | The air was raised to 1/2. |
1708h | T+2:44 | 2.25 Kg of charcoal was added. |
1713h | T+2:49 | The next tap was done with a good slag flow. |
1716h | T+2:52 | Closed the tap hole and added 1.5 Kg of charcoal. There had been a little slag from the first tap sitting without coming out. In this tap it came out. This let us have a comparison of the first and third taps side by side. The third tap was noticably less dense. |
1725h | T+3:01 | The turrie was cleaned again. |
1727h | T+3:03 | 1.5 Kg of charcoal added. At this point we became concerned that the volume of slag was so large that it might not be possible for the reducing charge to work. We decided to tap off some of the slag to make room. |
1737h | T+3:13 | We added more charcoal and began the tap. Unfortunately this tap really didn't produce any slag. |
1741h | T+3:17 | We added the sixth (reducing) charge. The tuyure was cleared again then charcoal added to top up the furnace. Three more turrie clearings were done in the next 9 minutes. |
1756h | T+3:32 | Another 1.5 Kg of charcoal was added. |
1759h | T+3:35 | The air was cranked up to full as air did not seem to be moving through the turrie due to the damage to the wall. |
1800h | T+3:36 | We tried another slag tapping to lower the level and try and get air through the turrie. This time we did not put the top brick back in. |
1806h | T+3:42 | Another 1.5Kg of charcoal was added. |
1814h | T+3:50 | The bottom brick was removed and a tap done. This did reduce the level clearing the turrie and letting the furnace begin to roar again. |
1816h | T+3:52 | Another 1.5Kg of charcoal was added. |
1826h | T+4:02 | We fired up a propane forge to take the bloom and keep it hot -- as you will see though we never did find the bloom. |
1830h | T+4:06 | We went to do the final pull of the slag. None came pouring out and we had to reach far up into the smelter attempting to pull any out. It was, however, too cold. We opened a larger door in the smelter to pull out the slag and bloom. (Next time we need to have two doors -- a small one for the slag and a large one for the bloom). Although we got a large cascade of very hot charcoal that wasn't quite what we were after. The smelter was knocked over. It broke apart and some materials were removed. Samples of these have been sent out for testing. All appear rather glasslike but their weights are shockingly different. Clearly some are "pure" slag while others have a high metal content. |
The furnace shape and size seemed to work fine. We were burning about 1.5 Kg (about a gallon) of charcoal every 12 - 15 minutes. The total charge of ore was about 18 lbs - added in 3 lb lots. On the face of it, the furnace seemed to be working fine. We got liquid slag at the point we expected. This material was pretty viscus, and still had considerable iron content. Over the second tap of slag, the material become more fluid, more glass like and far less dense, At that point we were pretty excited - as we knew the iron had to have gone somewhere.
The problem: First, the liquid slag started to pool up high
enough to clog the air intake. As the air was hitting the liquid slag
it was solidifying in a curved shape extending from the bottom. The
hole for air moved towards the top of our pipe - in fact deflecting the
air up. This was despite poking with a rod - eventually the air pipe
was actually inside the slag pool.
We're not sure why the 'bowl' formed so high - there was about 25 cm
between the floor of the furnace and the air intlet. It may have been
that the angle was not directed down enough, or perhaps the air flow
should have been higher. We came to the air volume based on Lee and
Skip's notes and visible consumption rates. We were adding charcoal
every time the level dropped down about 6 - 8 inches in the stack. We
tried 'full blast' for a minute or two, and you could see the
fuel level dropping. My guess is at that air flow we would have been
adding 3 lbs charcoal every 3 - 5 minutes. Our intake pipe was made of
straight 1" ID steel (schedule 40) - if the end had been slightly
crimped down to closer to 3/4" we might have had better
delivery pressure.
What seems to have happened is that the iron rich slag tapped out eariler was becoming semi molten and then re-freezing when it hit the spot where the furnace wall burned out. The slag poured out near the end of the process was likely liquified furnace wall. There was a large mass of 'gromp' attached to the furnace wall at the burn out point. We are hoping we may have something like spongy cast iron mixed in with the gromp. We did test over the hot surfaces of the grapefruit sized gromps with a magnet, and the pull is incosistant (which gives some hope).
We did learn a lot in terms of physical process and set up. The overall design of the furnace is sound - but needs some tuning in details (wall thickness / air intake angle / air pressure)
Reports of all of our iron smelting efforts along with more articles and information are available on the "Iron Smelting in the Viking Age" CD from the Wareham Forge. Copies of the CD can be purchased here. |