Iron Smelt Vinderheima Nov 2008
Date: 8 Nov, 2008
Location: Vinderheima
See also: http://www.warehamforge.ca/ironsmelting/
Premise:
- Experience with Icelandic setup & bellows plate/blow hole
- Overall set up is a totally earth surrounded smelter at the end of a slot - with the layout similar to those at Hals
- No bellows frame in position this time
- Use a medium walled clay cobb furnace structure.
- Use a bellows plate construction
- Use blow tube arrangement for the tuyere (which can quickly be modified to our normal insert tuyere if required.
- The aim is for a 3 - 5 kg bloom. (Hals size in range of 15 x 15 x 10 cm)
Experiment Notes - Norse Short Shaft Smelter in a frame
Diameter: |
26 cm |
Stack above Tuyure: |
42 cm |
Tuyure Diameter: |
2 cm I.D. (blow hole 5cm) |
Tuyure Distance above floor: |
20 cm |
Tuyure Angle: |
25° |
Tuyure distance from blow hole |
2.5 cm |
The Team:
Leader |
Ken Cook |
Staff |
Neil Peterson / Darrell Markewitz |
Recorder |
Darrell Markewitz |
Ore & Charcoal prep |
Ron Ross / Anatoli / Yasmin |
Archaeological records |
Ron Ross / Anatoli / Yasmin |
Strikers |
Neil Peterson / Ken Cook |
Construction |
Darrell Markewitz |
|
Reports of all of our iron smelting efforts along with more articles and information are available on the "Iron Smelting in the Viking Age" CD from the Wareham Forge. Copies of the CD can be purchased here. |
Smelt Totals
Total Charcoal |
48 Kg |
Weight of Bloom |
4.25 Kg |
Total Elapsed Time: |
5:00 |
Total Ore |
23 Kg (Virginia Rock ore / Hematite grit) |
Yield: |
18% |
Bloom Quality |
mild steel |
Discussion:
The bloom was less consolidated on extration than what is seen from a smelter with an insert tuyere - more of a 'lumpy' texture. It also was positioned a bit futher back from the air inlet than expected, and had a marked crescent shape.
As with the Thanksgiving smelt (which also used the plate / hole) there was a choke point at roughly 2 1/2 hours into the ore charging / about 7 kg. The developing slag bowl threatened to drown the air intake. On this attempt we were better able to control this, and the smelter would settle down once the slag evolved from the early green silica type to the later black iron rich type.
Conclusions:
- Overall set up
- As with the thanksgiving smelt there were no particular problems with this working arrangement.
- Use a bellows plate construction & Use blow tube arrangement for the tuyere
- It was clear that the team needs more experience working with this type of furnace set up. In itself, the bellows plate was found to work extremely well. The thinner material did in fact withstand the higher temperatures surrounding the air blast quite effectively. Leakage around the plate was due to clay shrinkage, as the body of the smelter had been baked dry before the plate was installed. Fitting the plate while the body of the smelter is still damp is expected to greatly reduce (if not totally eliminate) this effect.
The blow hole arrangement proved to be more of a problem. It was clear that the system was working correctly for the first portion of the smelt sequence. Consumption rates were slightly reduced from those seen with the insert tuyere, but still within what was considered the effective range. (A rate of between 6 - 12 minutes per 2 kg charcoal is sought, for this experiment the rate averaged 13 minutes per charge.)
Problems were encountered as the slag bowl began to reach the level of the air hole, Attempts to clear the hole were compounded by the restricted access because of the bellows frame combined with the lack of experience on the part of the operators with this type of air system. Modification of the air tube and adapting the air hole to correctly fit should be made (in line with suggestions by Michael Nissen)
The production aim for this experiment was for a 3 - 5 kg bloom, similar to those suggested for Hals (size in range of 15 x 15 x 10 cm). Despite the early problems with the blocked air hole, the team produced a 4.25 kg bloom.
|
|
|
|
Taking measurements |
Rodding out |
Blockage building up |
Inside view |
|
|
|
|
Overlapping tappings |
Salg tapping |
Removing charcoal |
Preparing thumper |
|
|
|
|
Thumping |
Main bloom mass |
Secondary bloom |
Front wall |
|
| | |
Anatoli sketching |
CLOCK |
ELAPSED |
EVENT |
AIR |
|
|
CHARCOAL |
|
|
ORE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNIT |
COUNT |
TOTAL |
UNIT |
COUNT |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
gage |
LpM |
P |
bucket |
|
kg |
scoop |
|
varies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
12:00 |
|
start wood splints pre-heat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14:20 |
2:20 |
gentle air |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14:38 |
2:38 |
fill with rough charcoal |
|
|
|
3 |
3 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0:00 |
|
main sequence start |
9 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0:16 |
16 |
start graded fuel |
61 |
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0:20 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
4 |
8 |
|
|
|
0:31 |
0:11 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
5 |
10 |
|
|
|
0:44 |
0:13 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
6 |
12 |
|
|
|
0:54 |
0:10 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
7 |
14 |
|
|
|
0:56 |
|
first ore added - Virginia Rock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1:06 |
0:12 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
8 |
16 |
4 |
4 |
0.8 |
1:16 |
0:10 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
9 |
18 |
4 |
8 |
1.6 |
1:26 |
0:10 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
10 |
20 |
4 |
12 |
2.4 |
1:37 |
0:11 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
11 |
22 |
4 |
16 |
3.2 |
1:49 |
0:12 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
12 |
24 |
4 |
20 |
4 |
2:03 |
0:14 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
13 |
26 |
4 |
24 |
4.8 |
2:20 |
0:17 |
hematite / rock blend (.8 + .2) |
|
|
|
1 |
14 |
28 |
4 |
28 |
5.8 |
2:38 |
0:18 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
15 |
30 |
4 |
32 |
6.8 |
2:44 |
|
air problems / pull tap block |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2:49 |
|
air to full |
|
1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2:50 |
0:12 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
16 |
32 |
4 |
36 |
7.8 |
3:02 |
0:12 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
17 |
34 |
8 |
44 |
9.8 |
3:15 |
0:13 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
18 |
36 |
8 |
52 |
11.8 |
3:29 |
0:14 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
19 |
38 |
8 |
60 |
13.8 |
3:38 |
0:09 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
20 |
40 |
8 |
68 |
15.8 |
3:50 |
0:12 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
21 |
42 |
8 |
76 |
17.8 |
4:00 |
0:10 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
22 |
44 |
8 |
84 |
19.8 |
4:11 |
0:11 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
23 |
46 |
8 |
92 |
21.8 |
4:19 |
0:08 |
start burn down |
|
|
|
1 |
24 |
48 |
8 |
100 |
23.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4:51 |
0:32 |
burn down completed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5:00 |
0:09 |
extraction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTALS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time |
5 |
hrs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ore |
23.8 |
kg |
|
Rock |
8.4 |
kg |
Hematite |
15.4 |
kg |
|
|
Charcoal |
48 |
kg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bloom |
3.25 |
kg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield |
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slag |
16.6 |
kg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gromps |
0.1 |
kg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total output recovered |
20 |
kg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reports of all of our iron smelting efforts along with more articles and information are available on the "Iron Smelting in the Viking Age" CD from the Wareham Forge. Copies of the CD can be purchased here. |